indexwhtbkgrd1
indexoverlay
downloadsheetbtn
requestsamplebtn

April 27, 2016

Take from the Poor and Give to the Rich


Take from the Poor and Give to the Rich

For as long as we can remember the media has portrayed the Republican Party as supporters of the wealthy and Democrats as advocates for the economically challenged. Recent administrative actions have suggested otherwise. Society is constantly told that small business is the “backbone of America” and that we were founded on the basis of those ambitious ideas. We are now in 2016 and it doesn’t quite seem like that’s the case does it? Recently administrative restrictions tend to aid the side of big business as opposed to the smaller local businesses when it comes to policies, especially those related to firearms and parts. Unnecessary amounts of restrictions and regulations with large fees leave small business owners no choice but to pull out of the market and close their doors simply because it’s no longer profitable nor feasible to keep them open.  Now the customers, who chose to support the small businesses, no longer have that option. They are forced to support large retailers, a perfect example of “Taking from the Poor and Giving to the Rich”. When drowning small businesses with restrictions and regulations does our nation’s government stop to consider the effectiveness of the legislative orders they are passing and what impact they are actually have on gun control and safety. Legislators should be forced to ask themselves the questions, was the legislation effective in improving gun safety or did it just put the poor man out of business? Perhaps the only impact the legislation had was satisfying public perception that we are part of a progressive movement.

April 15, 2016

The Wal-mart You Dont Know

*Article ORIGINATED, RETRIEVED, and PUBLISHED from http://www.fastcompany.com/47593/wal-mart-you-dont-know

The Wal-Mart You Don't Know

The giant retailer's low prices often come with a high cost. Wal-Mart's relentless pressure can crush the companies it does business with and force them to send jobs overseas. Are we shopping our way straight to the unemployment line?



A gallon-sized jar of whole pickles is something to behold. The jar is the size of a small aquarium. The fat green pickles, floating in swampy juice, look reptilian, their shapes exaggerated by the glass. It weighs 12 pounds, too big to carry with one hand. The gallon jar of pickles is a display of abundance and excess; it is entrancing, and also vaguely unsettling. This is the product that Wal-Mart fell in love with: Vlasic's gallon jar of pickles.
Wal-Mart priced it at $2.97—a year's supply of pickles for less than $3! "They were using it as a 'statement' item," says Pat Hunn, who calls himself the "mad scientist" of Vlasic's gallon jar. "Wal-Mart was putting it before consumers, saying, This represents what Wal-Mart's about. You can buy a stinkin' gallon of pickles for $2.97. And it's the nation's number-one brand."
Advertisement
Advertisement

Therein lies the basic conundrum of doing business with the world's largest retailer. By selling a gallon of kosher dills for less than most grocers sell a quart, Wal-Mart may have provided a ser-vice for its customers. But what did it do for Vlasic? The pickle maker had spent decades convincing customers that they should pay a premium for its brand. Now Wal-Mart was practically giving them away. And the fevered buying spree that resulted distorted every aspect of Vlasic's operations, from farm field to factory to financial statement.
Indeed, as Vlasic discovered, the real story of Wal-Mart, the story that never gets told, is the story of the pressure the biggest retailer relentlessly applies to its suppliers in the name of bringing us "every day low prices." It's the story of what that pressure does to the companies Wal-Mart does business with, to U.S. manufacturing, and to the economy as a whole. That story can be found floating in a gallon jar of pickles at Wal-Mart.
Wal-Mart is not just the world's largest retailer. It's the world's largest company—bigger than ExxonMobil, General Motors, and General Electric. The scale can be hard to absorb. Wal-Mart sold $244.5 billion worth of goods last year. It sells in three months what
number-two retailer Home Depot sells in a year. And in its own category of general merchandise and groceries, Wal-Mart no longer has any real rivals. It does more business than Target, Sears, Kmart, J.C. Penney, Safeway, and Kroger combined. "Clearly," says Edward Fox, head of Southern Methodist University's J.C. Penney Center for Retailing Excellence, "Wal-Mart is more powerful than any retailer has ever been." It is, in fact, so big and so furtively powerful as to have become an entirely different order of corporate being.
Wal-Mart wields its power for just one purpose: to bring the lowest possible prices to its customers. At Wal-Mart, that goal is never reached. The retailer has a clear policy for suppliers: On basic products that don't change, the price Wal-Mart will pay, and will charge shoppers, must drop year after year. But what almost no one outside the world of Wal-Mart and its 21,000 suppliers knows is the high cost of those low prices. Wal-Mart has the power to squeeze profit-killing concessions from vendors. To survive in the face of its pricing demands, makers of everything from bras to bicycles to blue jeans have had to lay off employees and close U.S. plants in favor of outsourcing products from overseas.
Advertisement
Advertisement

Of course, U.S. companies have been moving jobs offshore for decades, long before Wal-Mart was a retailing power. But there is no question that the chain is helping accelerate the loss of American jobs to low-wage countries such as China. Wal-Mart, which in the late 1980s and early 1990s trumpeted its claim to "Buy American," has doubled its imports from China in the past five years alone, buying some $12 billion in merchandise in 2002. That's nearly 10% of all Chinese exports to the United States.
One way to think of Wal-Mart is as a vast pipeline that gives non-U.S. companies direct access to the American market. "One of the things that limits or slows the growth of imports is the cost of establishing connections and networks," says Paul Krugman, the Princeton University economist. "Wal-Mart is so big and so centralized that it can all at once hook Chinese and other suppliers into its digital system. So—wham!—you have a large switch to overseas sourcing in a period quicker than under the old rules of retailing."
Steve Dobbins has been bearing the brunt of that switch. He's president and CEO of Carolina Mills, a 75-year-old North Carolina company that supplies thread, yarn, and textile finishing to apparel makers—half of which supply Wal-Mart. Carolina Mills grew steadily until 2000. But in the past three years, as its customers have gone either overseas or out of business, it has shrunk from 17 factories to 7, and from 2,600 employees to 1,200. Dobbins's customers have begun to face imported clothing sold so cheaply to Wal-Mart that they could not compete even if they paid their workers nothing.
"People ask, 'How can it be bad for things to come into the U.S. cheaply? How can it be bad to have a bargain at Wal-Mart?' Sure, it's held inflation down, and it's great to have bargains," says Dobbins. "But you can't buy anything if you're not employed. We are shopping ourselves out of jobs."
The gallon jar of pickles at Wal-Mart became a devastating success, giving Vlasic strong sales and growth numbers—but slashing its profits by millions of dollars.
There is no question that Wal-Mart's relentless drive to squeeze out costs has benefited consumers. The giant retailer is at least partly responsible for the low rate of U.S. inflation, and a McKinsey & Co. study concluded that about 12% of the economy's productivity gains in the second half of the 1990s could be traced to Wal-Mart alone.
There is also no question that doing business with Wal-Mart can give a supplier a fast, heady jolt of sales and market share. But that fix can come with long-term consequences for the health of a brand and a business. Vlasic, for example, wasn't looking to build its brand on a gallon of whole pickles. Pickle companies make money on "the cut," slicing cucumbers into spears and hamburger chips. "Cucumbers in the jar, you don't make a whole lot of money there," says Steve Young, a former vice president of grocery marketing for pickles at Vlasic, who has since left the company.
At some point in the late 1990s, a Wal-Mart buyer saw Vlasic's gallon jar and started talking to Pat Hunn about it. Hunn, who has also since left Vlasic, was then head of Vlasic's Wal-Mart sales team, based in Dallas. The gallon intrigued the buyer. In sales tests, priced somewhere over $3, "the gallon sold like crazy," says Hunn, "surprising us all." The Wal-Mart buyer had a brainstorm: What would happen to the gallon if they offered it nationwide and got it below $3? Hunn was skeptical, but his job was to look for ways to sell pickles at Wal-Mart. Why not?
Advertisement
Advertisement

And so Vlasic's gallon jar of pickles went into every Wal-Mart, some 3,000 stores, at $2.97, a price so low that Vlasic and Wal-Mart were making only a penny or two on a jar, if that. It was showcased on big pallets near the front of stores. It was an abundance of abundance. "It was selling 80 jars a week, on average, in every store," says Young. Doesn't sound like much, until you do the math: That's 240,000 gallons of pickles, just in gallon jars, just at Wal-Mart, every week. Whole fields of cucumbers were heading out the door.
For Vlasic, the gallon jar of pickles became what might be called a devastating success. "Quickly, it started cannibalizing our non-Wal-Mart business," says Young. "We saw consumers who used to buy the spears and the chips in supermarkets buying the Wal-Mart gallons. They'd eat a quarter of a jar and throw the thing away when they got moldy. A family can't eat them fast enough."
The gallon jar reshaped Vlasic's pickle business: It chewed up the profit margin of the business with Wal-Mart, and of pickles generally. Procurement had to scramble to find enough pickles to fill the gallons, but the volume gave Vlasic strong sales numbers, strong growth numbers, and a powerful place in the world of pickles at Wal-Mart. Which accounted for 30% of Vlasic's business. But the company's profits from pickles had shriveled 25% or more, Young says—millions of dollars.
The gallon was hoisting Vlasic and hurting it at the same time.

Charles Fishman (cnfish@mindspring.com) is a senior writer at Fast Company. Andrew Moesel provided research assistance for this story.
A version of this article appeared in the December 2003 issue of Fast Company magazine.


March 18, 2016

Who Controls Online Shopping?


Who Controls Online Shopping?

In recent years the promotion of gun related sales on the internet has steadily increased. That is until recently when Amazon, Facebook, and Instagram banned the sale of guns or gun related parts within their websites. Reports have come out saying that the Obama administration pressured these online moguls into implementing these bans. This leaves us to ask the questions, who controls our online shopping? What’s happening to free commerce?  According to the most recent census consumers continue to trend to online shopping, as 15% of all sales are online. Therefore by stopping the sales of guns and gun related parts on websites like Amazon, Facebook, and Instagram will substantially impact many manufacturers, distributors, and retailers financially. That being said the larger and wealthier corporations can withstand this loss, but nevertheless the small businesses don’t stand a chance due to the lack of alternative avenues to market their products through ecommerce. So one would ask the question again, who really controls Online Shopping? If it’s not “We the People” then who is it?

March 10, 2014

New Business Article

Business article posted about International Ordnance in the Jamestown Post Journal, written by Elizabeth Cipolla, SPHR: view article to gain insight about our company http://goo.gl/ZLZ2yD

January 13, 2014

IOT Launches Brand New Heat-treat Austemper Furnance and Increases Capacity

International Ordnance Tech., Inc. (IOT) is proud to announce the launch and First Article Approval of our new Austemper Heat-treat Furnace. The week of 1/6/14, Olin Winchester, ARDEC and DCMA performed First Article Testing on IOT small caliber links (M9, M13, M27), which doubled our capacity and certified our new heat-treat process. Final approval will come after the firing tests are performed at Olin Winchester in the near future.

Blog Archive

NEWS & LATEST EVENTS

  • aboutustab1
    • BAMcompanyprofile1
    • BAMmeetteam1
    • BAMhistory1
    • BAMquality1
    • BAMaffiliates1
    • nle
m10
m12 m11